| dc.contributor.author | Eyraud, Corine | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-11T02:46:00Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-12-11T02:46:00Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Eyraud C. (2022) Archaeology of a Quantification Device: Quantification, Policies and Politics in French Higher Education. In: Mennicken A., Salais R. (eds) The New Politics of Numbers. Executive Politics and Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78201-6_9 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78201-6_ | |
| dc.identifier.uri | ${sadil.baseUrl}/handle/123456789/1689 | |
| dc.description | 29 ; PDF | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper follows a quantification device – French higher education performance indicators – from its birth through its construction to its uses. It differentiates three levels of analysis. First, the bedrock level: a calculative device is grounded in a founding vision. Second, the intermediate level: a quantification device contains a conception of the “raisons d’être” of the entity that is quantified. Third, the level of the micro-conventions of calculation which can give a particular orientation. However, the device is part of a larger configuration which constitutes the fourth dimension of our analytical grid. Levels and context are the fruit of socio-historical processes which can, but must not, lead to maximum coherence. Here, the device is not a very integrated assemblage, which explains its limited effects. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Springer Nature | en_US |
| dc.subject | New Public Management | en_US |
| dc.subject | Performance indicators | en_US |
| dc.subject | Higher education | en_US |
| dc.subject | Calculative device | en_US |
| dc.subject | Valuation | en_US |
| dc.subject | Quantification | en_US |
| dc.title | Archaeology of a QuantificationDevice: Quantification, Policies and Politics in French Higher Education | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |