<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Article</title>
<link>https://sadil.ws/handle/123456789/4569</link>
<description/>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 22:51:43 GMT</pubDate>
<dc:date>2026-04-21T22:51:43Z</dc:date>
<item>
<title>n the Matter of Article 55 of the Constitution and In the Matter of a Resolution pursuant to Article 24(1) of the Constitution [of Nauru]: Adjudicating the Constitutionality of Parliamentary Change of Government</title>
<link>https://sadil.ws/handle/123456789/4587</link>
<description>n the Matter of Article 55 of the Constitution and In the Matter of a Resolution pursuant to Article 24(1) of the Constitution [of Nauru]: Adjudicating the Constitutionality of Parliamentary Change of Government
Tardi, Gregory; (Hons.), B.A.; L, B.C.; B, LL
Parliamentary government inherently comprises the search for political success and partisan advantage.&#13;
Democratic parliamentarianism requires, however, that public life be conducted in accordance with the&#13;
rule of law in both substantive and procedural respects. This is as true in micro-States as it is in greater&#13;
powers which have historically well-established democratic traditions. Indeed, the small size and remote&#13;
location of a State, as well as the lack of adequate reporting of its political law,[1] should not deter acute&#13;
observers from taking note of jurisprudence that both creates legal precedent and enlightens the path of&#13;
democracy in parliamentary and political practice.
</description>
<pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="false">https://sadil.ws/handle/123456789/4587</guid>
<dc:date>2022-04-02T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
